62 at 1-2.)2/ During the discovery process, Plaintiff served Defendant City of Imperial (hereinafterġ7 "City") with Request for Production of Documents Set No. Plaintiff has also brought a Monell claim against the City of Imperial (the "City"), alleging that the City has unlawful customs or practices of (1) improper and inadequate hiring, training, retention, discipline and/or supervision of its police officers and (2) permitting or condoning the application of excessive force, including the improper use of Tasers. § 1983 as well as tort claims against Officer Heredia and Officer Valenzuela, another officer at the scene. (FAC, ¶¶ 14-21.) Plaintiff has brought claims under 42 U.S.C. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that on November 3, 2007, Officer Abel Heredia, a City of Imperial police officer, shot him in the back with a Taser while detaining him for investigation of a minor graffiti charge. generally.) In addition 4 to providing Plaintiff a privilege log of the documents requested, Defendants have submitted one 5 category of documents for in camera review.1/ 6 Having considered the arguments submitted for and in opposition to this Motion, theħ Court GRANTS in part, and DENIES in part, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of 8 Documents. 92.) Defendants argue theĢ documents requested are protected by work-product and official information privileges as well 3 as the Officers' right to privacy and are irrelevant in this litigation. 28 79-1 at 6.)ĭefendants filed a response opposing the Motion. 1, 2.) Plaintiff now moves the Court for an 23 Order pursuant to Rule 37(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure compelling Defendants to 24 produce (1) insurance or third party investigation reports of the incident (2) Defendant Officers' 25 financial information (3) documents concerning "the alleged mixed martial arts training or and 26 response tactics used by City police officers " and (4) documents concerning investigations, 27 reports, complaints or lawsuits alleging the use of excessive force by City officers. § 1983 for alleged use of excessive force stemming from an incident 22 which occurred on November 3, 2007. 08cv2357 BTM (PCL) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S Plaintiff, SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTSĢ1 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 79) RUBEN GARCIA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. Our Customers and users are aware that this version is not iPad compatible.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Ruben Garcia, a minor, brings this civil rights action for money damages v. We do not have any active customers using it in iPad. This App version is not built to support iPad. SIU Case Manager users can view their cases & entities, and upload attachments.Store all completed mobile searches in the Recent Searches tab on Claims Inquiry web.Ĝontrol which fields to display on the Claims Summary Grid screen.ĝial the adjuster or company that handles the previous loss/claim directly from the app.View Location of Loss or Involved Party Address on Google Maps.
#Iso claim search iso
Search the entire ISO ClaimSearch database.Stay tuned for additional features to come.
Today we are pleased to offer mobile claim inquiries. Our easy-to-use mobile app will facilitate faster claims handling for superior claims data and insights.